The North Dakota House of Representatives has passed the first personhood amendment in the United States, 57-35. Read more
IVF in a state that protects embryos versus IVF in a state that doesn't
Abortion advocates claim that recognizing that newly conceived human beings (embryos) are persons under the law will ban in vitro fertilization. But the facts tell a different story.
In 1986, Louisiana recognized embryos in IVF clinics as legal persons. Did in vitro doctors run off to other states or did they continue to help infertile couples in Louisiana?
Consider this 2011 report from the Society for Reproductive Technology regarding Louisiana:
Name |
City |
Live Birth Rate per Xfer |
Cycles For Women Under 35 |
Avg Embryo Xfer |
Total Cycles All Groups |
Fertility and Women's Health Center of Louisiana |
Lafayette, LA |
56.4 |
82 |
2.1 |
163 |
Center for Fertility & Reproductive Health |
Shreveport, LA |
54.3 |
55 |
2.2 |
133 |
The Fertility Institute of New Orleans |
Mandeville, LA |
50.9 |
180 |
2.2 |
483 |
A Woman's Center for Reproductive Medicine |
Baton Rouge, LA |
39.6 |
57 |
1.9 |
137 |
Compare to this 2011 report regarding North Dakota:
Sanford Reproductive Medicine |
Fargo, ND |
56.2 |
95 |
2.1 |
212 |
The most obvious point is that recognizing embryos as persons has not driven in vitro fertilization from Louisiana. Looking at the data, the Live Birth Rate stats for the top three Louisiana clinics are about the same as the stats for North Dakota’s lone IVF clinic.
__________________
The opinions of blog authors are their own and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Personhood USA, its subsidiaries or affiliates.
Comments